Dr Piers Benn
Debates about the existence of God are familiar in philosophy. But the
question of whether it is a good thing that God exists (or would be a good
thing if he did) is much less discussed. Perhaps this is because, to many
people, it seems crazy to deny that it would be a superlatively good thing if
the cosmos were ruled by ultimate love and justice, that goodness will
ultimately prevail and the 'every tear shall be wiped away'. Atheists are
sometimes accused of not wanting God to exist, because they do not want to
surrender to the sovereignty of God or face judgement for their sins. I want to
defend (some) atheists of the charge of not wanting God to exist. However,
there is a serious question of whether - at least from the standpoint of atheism
or agnosticism - it would be an entirely good thing, or a good thing all things
considered, if God existed. This becomes especially apparent when we consider
particular religions traditions, and wonder whether the conception of God that
they advocate is a conception of a supremely good Being. For believers, the
question is obviously settled. However, non-believers lack a decisive a priori
reason to think it settled.
[Piers Benn is a Visiting Lecturer in Philosophy at Heythrop College,
University of London and an Adjunct Professor at Fordham University London
Centre].
|